The Organization of Dollar Importing Countries will be forced to pull the plug
Get fixed mortgage rates NOW!!!!! -- law
Billmon says:
... I’d like to pick up where I left off, which was with the question of whether the huge U.S. deficit – and the yawning imbalance it has created in the global economy – is the product of excessive savings (the chicken) or excessive U.S. demand for those savings (the egg.) The former is the position recently taken by Fed governor Bernard Bernanke – and, by implication, the Fed itself. The latter is the argument made forcefully by economist Nouriel Roubini in this recent post.
Roubini’s perspective, I might add, is almost universally held outside the United States – as well as at such bastions of economic orthodoxy as the International Monetary Fund and the Bank for International Settlements. (I’d put the World Bank on the list too, but the coming purge should take care of any right deviationist tendencies among the professional staff.)
Even our Chinese creditors seem to think the label on the problem should read “Made in the USA” – which hasn’t stopped them from continuing to provide the massive amounts of vendor financing needed to keep the problem from turning into a crisis. Maybe we should take a tip from John Mitchell (Nixon’s attorney general) and look at what the comrades in Beijing are doing instead of what they are saying.
As that last comment suggests, my own view is closer to Bernanke’s than Roubini’s – although I don’t find it nearly as comforting as the Fed seems to. Like Bernanke, I think there is a global “glut” of savings, one which has made it possible for the United States to finance its gluttonous appetites at interest rates I would never have believed possible when I first started thinking about this topic more than a decade ago.
However, I agree with Roubini that the Fed is whistling past an economic graveyard if it thinks the savings glut will allow America to continue sucking up 70-80% of all global capital flows for many years to come. The financial conditions that made that possible are on artificial life support. At some point the providers of that support – the central banks of China, Taiwan, Korea and Japan, or as I prefer to call them, the Organization of Dollar Importing Countries – will be forced to pull the plug. And like Roubini, I think that moment is likely to come sooner rather than later.
How much sooner? I would guess within the next 3-5 years, and that may be too optimistic. If the death of Bretton Woods is any guide, the end could be long, drawn out and messy. So the period of relatively trouble free sailing – when the issue could be confined to the back pages of the financial newspapers and to obscure blogs like this one – already may be almost over.
Whiskey Bar: The Chicken and the Egg, Part II